Guys And Dolls (1955)

by Paul on November 14, 2012

Post image for Guys And Dolls (1955)

 ★★★★★

 

Brando sings! It is still as exciting to hear today as it was 57 years ago. When producer Samuel Goldwyn decided to turn Guys And Dolls (1955) into a musical film he wanted the best actors possible. Nobody was bigger than Marlon Brando, even when considering the possibility of having Gene Kelly or even Frank Sinatra in the leading role. Brando’s lack of Guys And Dolls (1955)singing experience wasn’t a concern because as long as he can carry a tune, he would more than make up for any musical downsides with his strong acting ability. It was a role of the dice (if you will forgive the pun) that managed to work out much better than anyone (except Goldwyn) could have expected.

Based on the Broadway musical by Frank Loesser, Guys And Dolls tells two love stories that intertwine with each other, set in New York during the 1940’s. Nathan Detroit (Frank Sinatra) runs a roaming crap game that every big roller wants to join. He has been engaged to nightclub singer, Adelaide (Vivian Blaine), for 14 years, but is still unable to commit to a wedding date. On this particular day, Nathan can’t find a venue for Guys And Dolls (1955)his game and the high rollers are becoming impatient. The only option that he has found requires $1000 in advance, and Nathan is down on his luck at the moment.

In order to secure his $1000, Nathan makes a sure win bet with high roller Sky Masterson (Marlon Brando). Sky is heading to Havana this evening and Nathan can pick any girl in town for Sky to have to convince to go along on the trip. Sky agrees on the bet and Nathan picks the hard nosed, uncompromising, sister Sarah Brown (Jean Simmons) from the “Save A Soul” mission.

What ensues is a wonderful pair of Hollywood style romances, where against all odds, our characters find a connection that they never imagined to be possible. Nathan realizing that without Adelaide he has nothing left, and Sky Guys And Dolls (1955)understanding that one “doll” is better than his different “doll” every day mentality.

Typical Hollywood musicals from the 1950’s only featured highly talented musical artists. Everybody could sing or dance, and most of them could do both, but when Samuel Goldwyn fell in love with this story he wanted it to be more than just another great musical; he wanted it to be a great film. Sinatra, who desperately wanted to play Sky Masterson, was moved to the part of Nathan Detroit because fresh off On The Waterfront (1954), Brando was the biggest star in the world. Sinatra himself had just won an Academy Award for his supporting performance in From Here To Eternity(1953). Brando and Sinatra had previously found themselves competing for the same roles in both On The Waterfront and The Man With The Golden Arm (1955). It seems somewhat unusual that they would continue to be attracted to the same roles, but considering how talented they both proved to be, perhaps they weren’t Guys And Dolls (1955)attracted to the same roles as much as the best roles were attracted to them.

Since his film debut in 1950, Brando had made seven movies. Three of these movies were nominated for Best Picture Academy Awards, and Marlon Brando had already earned himself four Best Actor nominations. He was exactly what every actor wanted to be, and the perfect fit for Goldwyn and this musical extravaganza.

Brando had worked with director Joseph L. Mankiewicz just a couple of years earlier on Julius Caesar (1953), and Mankiewicz was thrilled to undertake his first musical with Brando standing next to him. Both a little unsure of their ownGuys And Dolls (1955) abilities, they worked marvelously in creating a film that could be remembered for more than just its songs and bright colors.

The next missing piece to Guys And Dolls was of course, the “dolls”. Vivian Blaine was an easy choice for Adelaide. She played the role for more than 1200 performances on Broadway and in London. There was nobody in the world that could have been Adelaide better than Blaine, and she made that even more obvious with her performance in this film.

Jean Simmons on the other hand might seem an unusual choice for Miss Sarah Brown. By the mid 1950’s, Simmons had already established herself as an extremely talented and dramatic young actress. By the age of 25, she had already starred Guys And Dolls (1955)in David Lean’s Great Expectations (1946), “The Archers” Black Narcissus (1947), Laurence Olivier’s Hamlet (1948), Otto Preminger’s Angel Face (1952) and the Biblical epic film The Robe (1953).  Of course it took Samuel Goldwyn to see the potential underneath her already impressive career. Simmons began her career as a young girl singing on the stage with her older sister. She then went on to study dance as a teenager, in order to one day become a dance instructor. Although her musical abilities may not be quite as good as other musical actress in the 1950’s, she obvious had a huge advantage in the drama department. She also had one other thing going for her; the year before Guys And Dolls, Jean Simmons had starred with Marlon Brando in the film, Desiree (1954). In this fictional romantic telling of Napoleon and Desiree, they showed great chemistry together, and Guys And Dolls proved toGuys And Dolls (1955) be a wonderful opportunity to move their natural spark to a more lighthearted and comedic setting. The result is a magical piece of filmmaking.

Together, it is the scenes with Brando and Simmons that are the most memorable in the film. Sinatra and Blaine are the obvious talented singers in the film, but because Brando and Simmons look so remarkable and carefree together, one can’t help but smile as they sing and dance their way to a happy ending. Especially in the fountain scene where they both appear to be having more fun than they have had at any previous point in their professional careers.

Guys And Dolls (1955)Guys And Dolls was a success from every angle. It was one of the highest grossing films of the year and earned decent reviews from almost everyone. People who felt that the film was miscast created most of the negativity, but today it is clear to see that Guys And Dolls is a treasure, because unlike every other musical from that era, the acting is just as important as the singing. Could Frank Sinatra have played the role of Sky Masterson? Of course, but then we may have never have heard one of the greatest dramatic actors ever confess his love to a co-star through song.

Back to Home for More Reviews

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

R. A. Kerr November 17, 2012 at 4:51 AM

I really enjoyed this review. I’m not a huge Brando fan but this film is a good example of his tremendous talent. Every time I see this movie, I remember the old story – true or not – that Brando deliberately flubbed his lines in the scene where he & Sinatra are in the restaurant and Sinatra was eating cheesecake. Apparently Sinatra hated cheesecake, and Brando was having a little sadistic fun making him eat it take after take.

Reply

Paul November 17, 2012 at 7:43 AM

I always assumed that this story was true because it seems like Brando’s personality would lean in this direction. Much like this scene in On The Waterfront when Eva Marie Saint drops her glove and Brandon won’t give it back. He just liked to mess with people. I don’t think Sinatra would have enjoyed the cheesecakes as much as I enjoy the story.

Reply

John June 21, 2013 at 6:11 AM

I love Sinatra. He just has to be considered the greatest entertainer of all time. Sinatra did a fine job in Guys And Dolls with Brando. I think Sinatra the actor is very under rated. His awesome performance in Suddenly showed what depth he had as an actor. The hidden gem A Hole In The Head is coming up Monday on TCM. A real fun film with Sinatra and EG Robinson playing brothers.

Reply

Paul June 21, 2013 at 3:38 PM

I enjoy Sinatra quite a bit as well. This role in particular is so enjoyable to watch, although “The Man with the Golden Arm”, “From Here to Eternity” and “Some Came Running are my favorites. I haven’t seen “Suddenly” in a while, but I did upgrade to blu-ray so I will watch it soon.

“A Hole in the Head” is a highly enjoyable film (like most Capra movies) and one that should be seen more often.

Reply

John September 12, 2013 at 5:27 PM

I just rewatched Sinatra in the movie It Happened In Brooklyn. Just a terrific film and Sinatra singing Time After Time at the piano is probably my favorite Sinatra movie song of all-time. Jimmy Durante, Peter Lawford and the multi talented Kathryn Grayson co-star in this must see film.

Reply

Paul September 13, 2013 at 7:04 AM

I really enjoy “It Happened in Brooklyn” as well. In all fairness, I must admit that I am a huge Sinatra fan, and enjoy watching any of his films. (Yes, even “4 for Texas”). Kathryn Grayson and I don’t always agree with each other, but she works with so many of favorites, I have come to enjoy her more over the years.

Reply

John September 13, 2013 at 1:54 PM

You know Grayson has really grown on me as well throughout the years. She has done some very good films with Mario Lanza. Grayson has that fine operatic voice I happen to enjoy even though I am not an opera fan by any stretch of the imagination. IMO one of her finest movies is called So This Is Love. She really has an incredibly sexy dance number in this one. As always we get to hear Grayson’s great operatic voice and in addition she does do a song or two without it. A very cool flick available at the Warner Archives.

Reply

Paul September 13, 2013 at 5:27 PM

Thanks for that suggestion. I will definitely check that out.

Reply

John September 12, 2013 at 5:34 PM

Paul, I don’t know if you ever saw Vivian Blain in Nob Hill with George Raft but it is sure worth a viewing. Blaine shows off some more versatile acting skills in this one. Without that silly accent that she puts on in Guys and Dolls, Blain just seems more enjoyable to me. But don’t get me wrong, I enjoyed her in Guys and Dolls as well.

Reply

Paul September 13, 2013 at 7:05 AM

I haven’t seen “Nob Hill”, but will add it to my watch list. It sounds like something I should check out.

Reply

John September 13, 2013 at 12:52 PM

You know Olive films has released The Miracle Of The Bells on DVD. That is another fine Frank Sinatra movie where Sinatra plays a priest of all people and he happens to be very believable in the role. If you haven’t checked out the Olive films web site it is well worth it. They are a bit pricey but seem to be committed to releasing a bunch of classic films on DVD. They even ask for film suggestions on what they are going to release in the future.

Reply

Paul September 13, 2013 at 5:25 PM

I did see that “Miracle of the Bells” became available. It’s on my, “try and be patient, and don’t spend my food money” list. Olive and I have a love/hate relationship. I love them for their ability to find movies I want, and bring them into my life. I hate them for their lack of bonus content and subtitles.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Have you Subscribed via RSS yet? Don't miss a post!

Previous post:

Next post: